POLITICSUNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Trump argues protective order would violate his free speech
4 hours ago4 hours ago
Prosecutors are keen to protect classified information they will share during Trump’s January 6 conspiracy trial. The former president’s lawyers claim prosecutors are trying to “gag” their client.

https://p.dw.com/p/4Usmy
Donald Trump, former president of the United States, arrives at Ronald Reagan Washington National Airport on August 3, 2023.
Trump’s legal team rejected a protection order as a violation of the former president’s free speechImage: Alex Brandon/AP Images
Former president Donald Trump’s legal team on Monday urged a federal judge to amend a protective order sought by prosecutors in Trump’s January 2020 election conspiracy trial, arguing the order would violate Trump’s First Amendment right to free speech.

Prosecutors have said that confidential documents and evidence they would share with the former president during the trial must be protected. Prosecutors expressed concern that Trump could use the information in the documents to intimidate individuals related to the trial, including witnesses.

qatar airways

A protective order would restrict the information Trump and his legal team are allowed to share with unauthorized personnel. It aims to protect the classified documents and information prosecutors must share with the defendant.

In other words, it could prohibit Trump from making such material public during the case.

What did Trump’s legal team say?
On Monday, Trump’s legal team submitted a 29-page filing to the US District Court in Washington as a response. They acknowledged the importance of shielding some of the documents from the public.

“However, the need to protect that information does not require a blanket gag order over all documents produced by the government,” they wrote in the court papers filed on Monday.

They suggested a more limited order that does not include all documents shared in the case.

The filing, nevertheless, did not directly address the assertion of witness intimidation.

“In a trial about First Amendment rights, the government seeks to restrict First Amendment rights,” Trump’s attorneys said, referring to the right of free speech guaranteed by the US Constitution.

What prompted the prosecutors’ request?
The request came after Trump posted what was perceived to be a threatening statement on his social media platform, Truth Social.

Shortly after facing a judge to plead not guilty over his indictment on charges that he engaged in a conspiracy to overturn the results of the 2020 election, Trump posted in all caps: “If you go after me, I’m coming after you.”

Prosecutors suspected the post was a threat to anyone involved in the trial against him.

The former president’s indictment on charges of conspiring to overturn his 2020 election loss is the third in four months for Trump. He is nonetheless currently considered the frontrunner in a campaign to become the 2024 Republican nominee for president.

Can latest charges against Trump harm his presidential run?
05:06
rmt/jsi (AP, Reuters)

LEAVE A REPLY